How to Measure If MVHR Is Worth It for Your Home: Payback, IAQ Gains and When to Choose a Heat Recovery Unit

Is MVHR worth it for your home in 2026? A practical, energy-centred guide to payback, IAQ gains and when to choose heat recovery

Are you fighting damp, high energy bills or stale air — but unsure whether a whole-house MVHR system or cheaper fixes are the smarter buy? This guide shows how to calculate payback for MVHR versus incremental upgrades (insulation, local extractors), gives real-life scenarios and sample calculations, and explains the 2026 trends that change the math. Read on for step-by-step numbers you can plug into your own cost calculator.

Quick answer up front (the inverted pyramid)

If your home is already reasonably airtight (<strong>air changes per hour < 1.0</strong>) and heated by heat pump adoption and electric heating, MVHR often pays back faster than in leaky, gas-heated homes. For typical UK retrofit semi-detached homes an MVHR installation costing £6,000–£10,000 can show payback in 7–15 years depending on your heating fuel, system efficiency and how many incremental upgrades you'd otherwise need. If your home is very leaky or only needs a small ventilation fix, start with targeted airtightness and extractor upgrades first — then re-evaluate MVHR.

Why 2026 is different — trends that affect MVHR value

• Heat pump adoption and electric heating. As more homes switch to heat pumps, the value of recovered heat rises because electricity-based heating is costlier per kWh. MVHR pairs well with heat pumps.
• Smart ventilation controls. 2025–26 devices bring demand-controlled ventilation (CO2/VOC/humidity sensors) that improves IAQ and reduces wasted fan energy — increasing effective payback.
• Demand-controlled ventilation (CO2/VOC/humidity sensors). New devices increasingly use local ML or rule engines to run DCV strategies — smarter control reduces runtime and boosts comfort.
• Variable energy prices and consumer focus on net-zero. Volatile energy costs since 2021 have made homeowners more sensitive to long-term efficiency investments.

How MVHR actually saves energy — the simple physics

To value MVHR you must estimate the ventilation heat loss avoided by recovering heat from outgoing stale air. Use this compact, proven formula:

Annual ventilation heat loss (kWh/year) = 2.89 × V̇ (m³/h) × ΔT (°C)

Where V̇ is whole-house ventilation rate in m³/hour and ΔT is the average indoor–outdoor temperature difference during your heating season. The constant 2.89 comes from air heat capacity and hours per year (0.33 × 8,760 / 1,000).

Then:

1. Energy saved by MVHR (kWh/year) = ventilation heat loss × MVHR efficiency
2. MVHR fan electricity use (kWh/year) = fan power (kW) × 8,760
3. Net annual energy saved (kWh) = energy saved by MVHR − MVHR electricity use
4. Annual £ saved = net kWh × heating cost (£/kWh)
5. Payback (years) = MVHR installed cost (£) ÷ annual £ saved

Calculator inputs you must know (or estimate)

• House volume (m³) — floor area × average ceiling height.
• Ventilation rate (ACH or m³/h) — typical design is 0.5 ACH for MVHR; whole-house V̇ = ACH × volume.
• Average ΔT (°C) — a practical default: 10–12°C for UK heating season, use 14–15°C for colder northern properties.
• MVHR efficiency — conservative 70%, typical 75–85% for modern systems; some compact units reach 90% in lab conditions.
• Fan power (W) — modern twin-fan systems: 40–120 W; high-efficiency units often <60 W at typical airflow.
• Heating cost (£/kWh) — use your latest bill. For estimates, try £0.12/kWh for gas and £0.28/kWh for electric/heat-pump adjusted cost.
• Installed cost — retrofit MVHR: £5,000–£12,000; new-build: £3,000–£6,000 depending on complexity and duct runs.

Three real-life scenarios with sample calculations (2026-ready)

Scenario 1 — Typical 3-bed semi-detached retrofit

Assumptions:

• Volume = 300 m³ (approx. 90 m² house × 2.7 m ceilings)
• Design ventilation = 0.5 ACH → V̇ = 0.5 × 300 = 150 m³/h
• Average ΔT = 12°C
• MVHR efficiency = 80%
• Fan power = 60 W (0.06 kW)
• Installed MVHR cost = £8,000
• Heating cost = two cases: gas £0.12/kWh and electric/heat-pump effective £0.28/kWh

Calculations:

1. Ventilation heat loss = 2.89 × 150 × 12 = 5,203 kWh/year
2. Energy recovered (saved) = 5,203 × 0.80 = 4,162 kWh/year
3. MVHR fan energy = 0.06 × 8,760 = 526 kWh/year
4. Net saved energy = 4,162 − 526 = 3,636 kWh/year
5. Annual £ saved (gas) = 3,636 × £0.12 = £436
6. Annual £ saved (electric) = 3,636 × £0.28 = £1,018
7. Payback (gas) = £8,000 ÷ £436 ≈ 18.3 years
8. Payback (electric) = £8,000 ÷ £1,018 ≈ 7.9 years

Interpretation: MVHR is far more cost-effective when your heat is delivered by electricity/heat pump. If you heat with gas and your house is not highly insulated, incremental fabric upgrades or targeted extractors may deliver quicker returns.

Scenario 2 — Low-energy new-build (Passivhaus-ish)

Assumptions:

• Volume = 250 m³
• Design ventilation = 0.5 ACH → V̇ = 125 m³/h
• ΔT = 10°C
• MVHR efficiency = 85% (high-efficiency unit)
• Fan power = 40 W (0.04 kW)
• Installed cost (new-build) = £4,000
• Heating cost = heat pump effective £0.28/kWh

Calculations:

1. Ventilation heat loss = 2.89 × 125 × 10 = 3,612 kWh/year
2. Energy recovered = 3,612 × 0.85 = 3,070 kWh
3. Fan energy = 0.04 × 8,760 = 350 kWh
4. Net saved energy = 3,070 − 350 = 2,720 kWh/year
5. Annual £ saved = 2,720 × £0.28 = £762
6. Payback = £4,000 ÷ £762 ≈ 5.3 years

Interpretation: In new-build or deep-retrofit low-energy homes MVHR is almost always a high-value investment, often paired with heat pumps and smart controls for even faster payback.

Scenario 3 — Victorian mid-terrace (leaky, some insulation)

Assumptions:

• Volume = 220 m³
• Measured natural ventilation ~1.2 ACH → V̇ = 1.2 × 220 = 264 m³/h
• ΔT = 12°C
• MVHR efficiency = 75%
• Fan power = 70 W (0.07 kW)
• Installed cost = £9,000 (duct complexity in retrofit)
• Heating cost = gas £0.12/kWh

Calculations:

1. Ventilation heat loss = 2.89 × 264 × 12 = 9,154 kWh/year
2. Energy recovered = 9,154 × 0.75 = 6,866 kWh
3. Fan energy = 0.07 × 8,760 = 613 kWh
4. Net saved energy = 6,866 − 613 = 6,253 kWh
5. Annual £ saved = 6,253 × £0.12 = £750
6. Payback = £9,000 ÷ £750 = 12 years

Interpretation: Despite the house being leaky, the larger airflows make the raw energy savings large. However, if you first invest £1,500–£3,000 in improving airtightness and loft insulation you reduce required ventilation and possibly lower MVHR scope — so consider staged upgrades.

Compare MVHR to incremental fixes — when cheaper options win

Incremental upgrades to consider before or instead of MVHR:

• Loft insulation upgrade — relatively cheap and reduces overall heat loss; typical cost £400–£1,000 and immediate energy savings.
• Draught-proofing and targeted airtightness — costs £200–£2,000; reduces uncontrolled ventilation and can improve thermal comfort dramatically.
• Trickle vents and mechanical extract fans — cheap local extract (kitchen, bathroom) may solve humidity and odour issues for £100–£400 per room.
• Window upgrades — double/triple glazing reduces fabric heat loss but is expensive; weigh against other measures.

Decision rule (practical):

• If you have visible condensation, mould or persistent high humidity despite extract fans — MVHR gives the best IAQ improvement.
• If you have high uncontrolled draughts, start with airtightness measures first; MVHR works best once the building is reasonably airtight.
• If your heat source is a heat pump or grid electricity, MVHR's recovered heat has higher monetary value — favour MVHR.

IAQ gains you can expect (quantified benefits)

MVHR is not only about energy:

• CO2: Whole-house mechanical supply reduces indoor CO2 — typical reductions from >1,500 ppm to 600–900 ppm, improving sleep and cognitive function.
• Humidity: Balanced ventilation controls indoor RH; expect average winter RH reductions from 70% to 40–50% reducing mould growth risk.
• Particulates and VOCs: MVHR filters trap PM2.5 and some VOCs, reducing outdoor pollution ingress.

For families with asthma/allergies, the health and comfort improvements from MVHR often weigh as heavily as pure energy savings.

Operating costs and maintenance (don’t forget the ongoing spend)

• Filters: Replace every 6–12 months — cost £20–£60 per year depending on grade.
• Electricity: Fan energy is the main running cost (see scenarios).
• Service: Occasional duct cleaning/inspection every 3–5 years (£100–£300).
• Component life: Fans and controls may need replacement or upgrade after 10–15 years.

How to measure whether MVHR is the right next step for your home — a 6-step checklist

1. Assess airtightness — measure or estimate ACH. If you have a blower-door test result, use it. If not, CO2 monitoring during occupancy gives good practical insight.
2. Audit heating system — note whether you use gas, oil, electric or a heat pump and compute your cost per kWh from recent bills.
3. Estimate ventilation need — use house volume and desired ACH (0.5 ACH for MVHR) to get V̇ (m³/h).
4. Pick conservative MVHR specs — choose 70–80% efficiency and 50–80 W fan power for retrofits; new-builds can use more efficient units.
5. Calculate payback — use the formulas earlier in this article and produce best / worst case scenarios.
6. Compare to incremental fixes — get quotes for loft insulation, draught-proofing and extract fans and do the same payback math for those measures.

Practical tips and advanced strategies for 2026

• Pair MVHR with a heat pump. The synergy is strong: MVHR recovers heat that would otherwise add load to an expensive electric heat source.
• Choose demand-controlled ventilation (DCV). Sensors for CO2, humidity and VOCs reduce unnecessary airflow and fan energy — improving payback by 10–30% in many homes.
• Consider staged retrofits. Start with insulation and airtightness; MVHR can be added later when ventilation demand is clear.
• Plan duct runs early in renovations. Ducting is the most intrusive part of retrofits. Early planning reduces installation cost by thousands.
• Shop for integrated systems. New MVHR units with smart controls, remote monitoring and low-watt EC fans became mainstream in 2025–26 — choose units with measured SFP (specific fan power) <1.5 W/(L/s) for best efficiency.

Common mistakes to avoid

• Installing MVHR into a leaky home without addressing major draughts — you will over-ventilate and lose savings.
• Choosing the cheapest system without checking measured efficiency and SFP.
• Ignoring filter and service costs — they matter for long-term IAQ and performance.
• Assuming manufacturer efficiency is identical in-situ — duct leakage and poor commissioning reduce real-world efficiency.

Final decision framework — a short checklist

• Is your home fairly airtight (ACH < 1.0)? — MVHR likely valuable.
• Do you have persistent condensation, mould or poor bedroom air? — MVHR gives major IAQ improvements.
• Are you (or will you be) heating with electricity/heat pump? — MVHR payback improves significantly.
• Can you afford an upfront £4k–£10k retrofit and tolerate 5–15 year payback? — then MVHR is a viable upgrade.

Want a quick DIY payback estimate? Use this mini-calculator

1. Volume (m³) = floor area (m²) × ceiling height (m).
2. V̇ (m³/h) = volume × desired ACH (0.5 default).
3. Vent loss (kWh) = 2.89 × V̇ × ΔT (use 10–12°C).
4. Saved by MVHR (kWh) = vent loss × efficiency (0.7–0.85).
5. Fan energy (kWh) = fan power (kW) × 8,760.
6. Net kWh saved = saved − fan energy. Annual £ saved = net kWh × heating price.
7. Payback = installed cost ÷ annual £ saved.

Summary: When MVHR is (and isn't) the right choice in 2026

MVHR is the right choice when: your home is, or will become, airtight; you have condensation/mould/IAQ problems; you heat with electricity or a heat pump; you plan long-term energy and comfort improvements. High-efficiency MVHR plus DCV and smart controls are now available in 2026 and push payback in the right direction.

MVHR is less attractive when: your home is very leaky and you can achieve significant gains from low-cost insulation and draught-sealing; your heating is cheap fossil gas and you need the fastest payback now. In these cases, sequence improvements: fix fabric and extract fans first, then re-run the MVHR calculation.

Call to action

Ready to know whether MVHR is right for your house? Use our free online payback calculator at Airvent (or click to book an on-site assessment) — we’ll factor your exact volume, measured temperatures, local energy costs and ducting complexity. Prefer a 15-minute phone walkthrough? Contact our technical advisors for a tailored estimate and an action plan that prioritises the highest-impact, fastest-payback measures for your home.

Start with a free home ventilation audit — request a quote today and get a customised payback report within 48 hours.

Related Reading

• Green Tech Deals Tracker: home power, heat pump context
• How to choose the right power station for home backup
• Running local models and smart controls for home systems
• Warm & Safe: safe use of microwavable heat packs (related household safety)
• Email Deliverability Playbook for the Gmail AI Era
• How to Market Cat Food in a ‘Balance-First’ Era: Messaging that Resonates Post-Dry January
• Host Better Office Hours: Using Bluesky + Twitch Live Streams for Study Sessions
• The Micro‑Event Playbook for Community Health Workshops (2026): Convert Short Sessions into Lasting Impact
• Windows Update Incident Response: Runbook For When Patches Break Critical Services